2002 NBA Effective FG Percentage Leaders
Field goal percentage weighting threes
Eddy Curry led the NBA in effective fg percentage in 2002 with 58.5%, 1.1 percentage points ahead of Shaquille O'Neal (57.4%).
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2002
Eddy Curry
CHI
58.5%
Effective FG Percentage
1.1% clear of Shaquille O'Neal
Showing Effective FG Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | eFG% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
CHI | 58.5% | 81 | 335 | 573 | 58.5% |
| 2 | Shaquille O'Neal | LAL | 57.4% | 67 | 695 | 1,211 | 57.4% |
| 3 |
|
MIL | 56.2% | 82 | 455 | 971 | 46.9% |
| 4 |
|
SAC | 55.6% | 72 | 497 | 1,034 | 48.1% |
| 5 |
|
UTA | 54.3% | 78 | 521 | 1,020 | 51.1% |
| 6 |
|
CLE | 53.6% | 81 | 331 | 618 | 53.6% |
| 7 |
|
NOH | 53.1% | 78 | 319 | 601 | 53.1% |
| 8 |
|
ORL | 52.8% | 81 | 312 | 744 | 41.9% |
| 9 |
|
SAC | 52.5% | 59 | 340 | 732 | 46.5% |
| 10 |
|
MIN | 52.5% | 77 | 400 | 762 | 52.5% |
| 11 |
|
MIN | 52.3% | 52 | 351 | 729 | 48.2% |
| 12 | Kerry Kittles | NJN | 52.2% | 65 | 332 | 711 | 46.7% |
| 13 |
|
POR | 52.1% | 74 | 515 | 1,094 | 47.1% |
| 14 |
|
UTA | 52.0% | 80 | 315 | 642 | 49.1% |
| 15 |
|
DEN | 51.9% | 80 | 321 | 619 | 51.9% |
| 16 |
|
PHI | 51.6% | 74 | 459 | 952 | 48.2% |
| 17 |
|
SAS | 51.5% | 81 | 714 | 1,392 | 51.3% |
| 18 |
|
DAL | 51.5% | 82 | 518 | 1,114 | 46.5% |
| 19 |
|
DAL | 51.3% | 80 | 690 | 1,489 | 46.3% |
| 20 |
|
SEA | 51.3% | 76 | 598 | 1,363 | 43.9% |
| 21 |
|
CLE | 51.2% | 80 | 308 | 710 | 43.4% |
| 22 |
|
MEM | 51.0% | 82 | 569 | 1,116 | 51.0% |
| 23 |
|
SAC | 51.0% | 55 | 329 | 700 | 47.0% |
| 24 | Brian Grant | MIA | 50.9% | 82 | 344 | 676 | 50.9% |
| 25 |
|
MIN | 50.8% | 82 | 743 | 1,481 | 50.2% |
| 26 |
|
UTA | 50.7% | 81 | 325 | 651 | 49.9% |
| 27 |
|
DET | 50.6% | 74 | 366 | 870 | 42.1% |
| 28 |
|
NYK | 50.6% | 82 | 652 | 1,465 | 44.5% |
| 29 |
|
UTA | 50.6% | 82 | 309 | 640 | 48.3% |
| 30 |
|
ORL | 50.5% | 75 | 829 | 1,813 | 45.7% |
| 31 |
|
NJN | 50.4% | 80 | 456 | 911 | 50.1% |
| 32 |
|
SAS | 50.3% | 82 | 484 | 1,043 | 46.4% |
| 33 |
|
LAC | 50.2% | 62 | 451 | 899 | 50.2% |
| 34 |
|
PHX | 50.0% | 81 | 662 | 1,466 | 45.2% |
| 35 |
|
HOU | 49.9% | 82 | 401 | 805 | 49.8% |
| 36 |
|
ATL | 49.8% | 81 | 488 | 1,141 | 42.8% |
| 37 |
|
MEM | 49.8% | 65 | 373 | 859 | 43.4% |
| 38 |
|
NOH | 49.8% | 73 | 449 | 1,037 | 43.3% |
| 39 |
|
IND | 49.7% | 73 | 329 | 667 | 49.3% |
| 40 |
|
TOR | 49.7% | 43 | 355 | 760 | 46.7% |
| 41 |
|
POR | 49.6% | 76 | 355 | 832 | 42.7% |
| 42 |
|
MIL | 49.5% | 78 | 546 | 1,162 | 47.0% |
| 43 |
|
MIL | 49.5% | 80 | 412 | 930 | 44.3% |
| 44 |
|
SAS | 49.3% | 80 | 356 | 818 | 43.5% |
| 45 |
|
LAL | 49.2% | 82 | 339 | 775 | 43.7% |
| 46 |
|
GSW | 49.2% | 82 | 691 | 1,471 | 47.0% |
| 47 |
|
ORL | 48.9% | 76 | 350 | 803 | 43.6% |
| 48 |
|
ATL | 48.7% | 81 | 566 | 1,183 | 47.8% |
| 49 |
|
IND | 48.7% | 77 | 610 | 1,260 | 48.4% |
| 50 |
|
WAS | 48.7% | 67 | 346 | 741 | 46.7% |
1–50 of 106Next →