2015 NBA Three-Point Percentage Leaders
Share of three-pointers made
JJ Redick led the NBA in three-point percentage in 2015 with 47.5%, 2.1 percentage points ahead of Stephen Curry (45.4%). It stands 18th among all single seasons in NBA history.
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the NBA in 2015
JJ Redick
LAC
47.5%
Three-Point Percentage
2.1% clear of Stephen Curry
Showing Three-Point Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | 3P% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LAC | 47.5% | 75 | 422 | 880 | 48.0% |
| 2 |
|
GSW | 45.4% | 79 | 805 | 1,598 | 50.4% |
| 3 |
|
SAS | 44.3% | 72 | 551 | 1,090 | 50.6% |
| 4 |
|
MIL | 43.7% | 52 | 185 | 437 | 42.3% |
| 5 |
|
CHI | 42.5% | 81 | 291 | 644 | 45.2% |
| 6 |
|
GSW | 42.5% | 80 | 651 | 1,386 | 47.0% |
| 7 |
|
WAS | 42.0% | 81 | 233 | 487 | 47.8% |
| 8 |
|
POR | 41.7% | 80 | 641 | 1,431 | 44.8% |
| 9 |
|
DAL | 41.4% | 61 | 320 | 651 | 49.2% |
| 10 |
|
NYK | 41.4% | 72 | 209 | 455 | 45.9% |
| 11 |
|
CLE | 41.0% | 76 | 207 | 511 | 40.5% |
| 12 |
|
SAC | 40.9% | 69 | 299 | 622 | 48.1% |
| 13 |
|
IND | 40.8% | 74 | 326 | 739 | 44.1% |
| 14 |
|
BOS | 40.5% | 69 | 253 | 556 | 45.5% |
| 15 |
|
CHA | 40.2% | 81 | 338 | 747 | 45.3% |
| 16 |
|
ATL | 40.2% | 79 | 434 | 988 | 43.9% |
| 17 |
|
SAC | 40.1% | 74 | 377 | 776 | 48.6% |
| 18 |
|
ORL | 40.0% | 79 | 429 | 929 | 46.2% |
| 19 |
|
CLE | 40.0% | 77 | 353 | 850 | 41.5% |
| 20 |
|
HOU | 40.0% | 71 | 258 | 594 | 43.4% |
| 21 |
|
ATL | 39.8% | 80 | 268 | 617 | 43.4% |
| 22 |
|
MIL | 39.6% | 79 | 507 | 1,142 | 44.4% |
| 23 |
|
PHX | 39.4% | 79 | 332 | 777 | 42.7% |
| 24 |
|
POR | 39.3% | 81 | 311 | 678 | 45.9% |
| 25 |
|
CHI | 39.0% | 66 | 248 | 609 | 40.7% |
| 26 |
|
MIN | 38.9% | 82 | 433 | 959 | 45.2% |
| 27 |
|
GSW | 38.8% | 81 | 401 | 819 | 49.0% |
| 28 |
|
TOR | 38.8% | 77 | 512 | 1,198 | 42.7% |
| 29 |
|
WAS | 38.8% | 55 | 359 | 799 | 44.9% |
| 30 |
|
CLE | 38.7% | 70 | 152 | 347 | 43.8% |
| 31 |
|
OKC | 38.7% | 72 | 698 | 1,381 | 50.5% |
| 32 |
|
TOR | 38.6% | 73 | 270 | 626 | 43.1% |
| 33 |
|
DAL | 38.5% | 74 | 317 | 711 | 44.6% |
| 34 |
|
SAS | 38.4% | 81 | 260 | 612 | 42.5% |
| 35 |
|
NOP | 38.4% | 45 | 231 | 552 | 41.9% |
| 36 |
|
MIA | 38.3% | 81 | 377 | 859 | 43.9% |
| 37 |
|
GSW | 38.3% | 66 | 295 | 633 | 46.6% |
| 38 |
|
NYK | 38.2% | 71 | 354 | 799 | 44.3% |
| 39 |
|
BKN | 38.2% | 79 | 324 | 749 | 43.3% |
| 40 |
|
PHI | 38.0% | 77 | 270 | 680 | 39.7% |
| 41 |
|
CHA | 37.8% | 79 | 290 | 639 | 45.4% |
| 42 |
|
POR | 37.7% | 61 | 195 | 435 | 44.8% |
| 43 |
|
POR | 37.5% | 75 | 618 | 1,474 | 41.9% |
| 44 |
|
CHA | 37.1% | 81 | 568 | 1,331 | 42.7% |
| 45 |
|
IND | 37.1% | 81 | 605 | 1,449 | 41.8% |
| 46 |
|
LAC | 37.1% | 74 | 515 | 1,114 | 46.2% |
| 47 |
|
HOU | 37.1% | 81 | 357 | 859 | 41.6% |
| 48 |
|
ORL | 37.1% | 74 | 280 | 661 | 42.4% |
| 49 |
|
DAL | 36.8% | 75 | 498 | 1,112 | 44.8% |
| 50 |
|
WAS | 36.7% | 75 | 339 | 717 | 47.3% |
1–50 of 103Next →