2010 AFC Catch Percentage Leaders
Share of targets caught
Austin Collie led the AFC in catch percentage in 2010 with 81.4%, 2.2 percentage points ahead of Peyton Hillis (79.2%).
Showing players who met 1.875 receptions per team game. Show all players
Led the AFC in 2010
Austin Collie
Indianapolis Colts
81.4%
Catch Percentage
2.2% clear of Peyton Hillis
Showing Catch Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | CTH% | G | REC | YDS | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
IND | 81.4% | 9 | 57 | 617 | 8 |
| 2 |
|
CLE | 79.2% | 16 | 61 | 477 | 2 |
| 3 |
|
LAC | 78.7% | 16 | 59 | 520 | 2 |
| 4 |
|
MIA | 78.6% | 16 | 33 | 242 | 0 |
| 5 |
|
HOU | 78.6% | 16 | 66 | 604 | 2 |
| 6 |
|
NE | 77.3% | 15 | 34 | 379 | 1 |
| 7 |
|
JAX | 77.3% | 14 | 34 | 317 | 2 |
| 8 |
|
TEN | 77.2% | 16 | 44 | 245 | 1 |
| 9 |
|
DEN | 77.1% | 13 | 37 | 372 | 3 |
| 10 |
|
LV | 77.0% | 13 | 47 | 507 | 3 |
| 11 |
|
LAC | 76.9% | 10 | 50 | 782 | 10 |
| 12 |
|
BAL | 76.8% | 16 | 63 | 556 | 1 |
| 13 |
|
IND | 72.0% | 13 | 67 | 631 | 4 |
| 14 |
|
NE | 71.2% | 16 | 42 | 546 | 10 |
| 15 |
|
KC | 70.3% | 16 | 45 | 468 | 3 |
| 16 |
|
NE | 70.3% | 14 | 45 | 563 | 6 |
| 17 |
|
CIN | 70.3% | 15 | 52 | 600 | 3 |
| 18 |
|
NE | 69.9% | 15 | 86 | 848 | 7 |
| 19 |
|
IND | 69.8% | 6 | 37 | 347 | 3 |
| 20 |
|
TEN | 69.2% | 13 | 36 | 318 | 4 |
| 21 |
|
CLE | 66.7% | 16 | 68 | 763 | 3 |
| 22 |
|
NE | 66.3% | 15 | 61 | 818 | 6 |
| 23 |
|
BUF | 66.0% | 14 | 31 | 353 | 3 |
| 24 |
|
NYJ | 65.8% | 15 | 52 | 368 | 0 |
| 25 |
|
HOU | 65.5% | 16 | 36 | 518 | 4 |
| 26 |
|
HOU | 65.4% | 15 | 51 | 562 | 3 |
| 27 | Mike Thomas | JAX | 65.3% | 16 | 66 | 820 | 4 |
| 28 |
|
LV | 65.2% | 15 | 60 | 685 | 5 |
| 29 |
|
JAX | 65.2% | 16 | 58 | 700 | 10 |
| 30 |
|
MIA | 65.0% | 15 | 39 | 528 | 4 |
| 31 |
|
KC | 64.4% | 15 | 47 | 556 | 3 |
| 32 |
|
HOU | 63.8% | 14 | 51 | 621 | 5 |
| 33 |
|
MIA | 63.5% | 16 | 80 | 817 | 5 |
| 34 | Chansi Stuckey | CLE | 63.5% | 15 | 40 | 346 | 0 |
| 35 |
|
PIT | 63.4% | 16 | 59 | 755 | 5 |
| 36 |
|
IND | 63.4% | 16 | 111 | 1,355 | 6 |
| 37 |
|
IND | 63.2% | 13 | 36 | 355 | 5 |
| 38 |
|
PIT | 62.7% | 14 | 42 | 512 | 2 |
| 39 |
|
CIN | 62.7% | 15 | 52 | 471 | 4 |
| 40 |
|
BAL | 62.5% | 13 | 40 | 599 | 5 |
| 41 |
|
HOU | 62.3% | 13 | 86 | 1,216 | 8 |
| 42 | Roscoe Parrish | BUF | 62.3% | 8 | 33 | 392 | 2 |
| 43 |
|
PIT | 61.2% | 16 | 60 | 1,257 | 10 |
| 44 |
|
BAL | 61.0% | 16 | 61 | 802 | 7 |
| 45 |
|
MIA | 58.9% | 14 | 86 | 1,014 | 3 |
| 46 |
|
MIA | 58.9% | 12 | 43 | 615 | 1 |
| 47 |
|
BAL | 58.7% | 16 | 64 | 837 | 7 |
| 48 |
|
DEN | 58.0% | 16 | 65 | 875 | 2 |
| 49 |
|
BUF | 57.7% | 16 | 82 | 1,073 | 10 |
| 50 |
|
TEN | 57.5% | 11 | 42 | 775 | 9 |
1–50 of 69Next →