2010 WNBA Three-Pointers Attempted Leaders
Three-pointers attempted
Diana Taurasi led the WNBA in three-pointers attempted in 2010 with 214, 25 ahead of Renee Montgomery (189). It stands 68th among all single seasons in WNBA history.
Led the WNBA in 2010
Diana Taurasi
PHO
214
Three-Pointers Attempted
25 clear of Renee Montgomery
Showing Three-Pointers Attempted and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | 3PA | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
PHO | 214 | 31 | 212 | 497 | 42.7% |
| 2 |
|
CON | 189 | 34 | 158 | 394 | 40.1% |
| 3 |
|
SAN | 177 | 32 | 159 | 360 | 44.2% |
| 4 |
|
IND | 174 | 34 | 170 | 379 | 44.9% |
| 5 |
|
NYL | 167 | 34 | 112 | 288 | 38.9% |
| 6 |
|
LAS | 162 | 33 | 198 | 444 | 44.6% |
| 7 | Roneeka Hodges | SAN | 159 | 34 | 94 | 263 | 35.7% |
| 8 | Iziane Castro Marques | ATL | 156 | 34 | 220 | 496 | 44.4% |
| 9 |
|
SEA | 156 | 32 | 220 | 476 | 46.2% |
| 10 |
|
NYL | 149 | 34 | 254 | 526 | 48.3% |
| 11 |
|
WAS | 149 | 33 | 109 | 276 | 39.5% |
| 12 |
|
NYL | 148 | 34 | 105 | 238 | 44.1% |
| 13 |
|
SEA | 148 | 33 | 135 | 311 | 43.4% |
| 14 |
|
PHO | 147 | 34 | 118 | 299 | 39.5% |
| 15 | Shanna Zolman | TUL | 135 | 30 | 105 | 260 | 40.4% |
| 16 |
|
CON | 134 | 34 | 121 | 288 | 42.0% |
| 17 |
|
CON | 128 | 34 | 101 | 247 | 40.9% |
| 18 |
|
SAN | 127 | 33 | 67 | 181 | 37.0% |
| 19 |
|
MIN | 126 | 34 | 153 | 368 | 41.6% |
| 20 |
|
ATL | 126 | 34 | 246 | 603 | 40.8% |
| 21 |
|
CHI | 109 | 34 | 145 | 366 | 39.6% |
| 22 |
|
MIN | 107 | 25 | 176 | 410 | 42.9% |
| 23 |
|
LAS | 106 | 34 | 105 | 240 | 43.8% |
| 24 |
|
IND | 105 | 34 | 207 | 428 | 48.4% |
| 25 |
|
PHO | 104 | 32 | 173 | 340 | 50.9% |
| 26 |
|
WAS | 102 | 34 | 75 | 189 | 39.7% |
| 27 |
|
SEA | 101 | 34 | 97 | 234 | 41.5% |
| 28 |
|
CHI | 100 | 34 | 70 | 170 | 41.2% |
| 29 |
|
CHI | 98 | 34 | 63 | 180 | 35.0% |
| 30 |
|
PHO | 97 | 34 | 122 | 297 | 41.1% |
| 31 |
|
MIN | 94 | 34 | 139 | 376 | 37.0% |
| 32 |
|
LAS | 87 | 34 | 137 | 309 | 44.3% |
| 33 |
|
SEA | 86 | 34 | 161 | 370 | 43.5% |
| 34 | Amber Holt | TUL | 86 | 33 | 98 | 240 | 40.8% |
| 35 |
|
WAS | 83 | 34 | 146 | 335 | 43.6% |
| 36 |
|
IND | 82 | 34 | 106 | 267 | 39.7% |
| 37 |
|
LAS | 82 | 34 | 193 | 411 | 47.0% |
| 38 |
|
TUL | 81 | 18 | 78 | 185 | 42.2% |
| 39 | Tully Bevilaqua | IND | 77 | 34 | 46 | 120 | 38.3% |
| 40 |
|
CON | 77 | 19 | 51 | 131 | 38.9% |
| 41 | Scholanda Dorrell | TUL | 76 | 34 | 145 | 361 | 40.2% |
| 42 |
|
CHI | 71 | 34 | 117 | 274 | 42.7% |
| 43 |
|
ATL | 70 | 30 | 31 | 107 | 29.0% |
| 44 |
|
MIN | 66 | 33 | 134 | 327 | 41.0% |
| 45 |
|
IND | 59 | 30 | 65 | 175 | 37.1% |
| 46 |
|
SEA | 56 | 34 | 107 | 261 | 41.0% |
| 47 |
|
TUL | 55 | 23 | 47 | 124 | 37.9% |
| 48 |
|
PHO | 53 | 32 | 132 | 284 | 46.5% |
| 49 |
|
WAS | 52 | 34 | 157 | 353 | 44.5% |
| 50 | Andrea Riley | LAS | 51 | 29 | 27 | 89 | 30.3% |
1–50 of 143Next →