2019 WNBA True Shooting Percentage Leaders
Shooting efficiency including free throws
Elena Delle Donne led the WNBA in true shooting percentage in 2019 with 63.3%, 0.1 percentage points ahead of Allie Quigley (63.3%). It stands 68th among all single seasons in WNBA history.
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the WNBA in 2019
Elena Delle Donne
WAS
63.3%
True Shooting Percentage
0.1% clear of Allie Quigley
Showing True Shooting Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | TS% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
WAS | 63.3% | 31 | 220 | 427 | 51.5% |
| 2 |
|
CHI | 63.3% | 34 | 171 | 347 | 49.3% |
| 3 |
|
WAS | 62.8% | 23 | 122 | 221 | 55.2% |
| 4 |
|
WAS | 62.3% | 31 | 113 | 220 | 51.4% |
| 5 |
|
CHI | 62.1% | 34 | 121 | 233 | 51.9% |
| 6 |
|
MIN | 61.3% | 34 | 197 | 335 | 58.8% |
| 7 |
|
PHO | 60.3% | 32 | 134 | 304 | 44.1% |
| 8 |
|
SEA | 60.2% | 31 | 114 | 237 | 48.1% |
| 9 |
|
PHO | 60.1% | 31 | 270 | 479 | 56.4% |
| 10 |
|
WAS | 59.5% | 23 | 116 | 235 | 49.4% |
| 11 |
|
DAL | 59.3% | 34 | 117 | 256 | 45.7% |
| 12 |
|
WAS | 58.7% | 30 | 108 | 249 | 43.4% |
| 13 |
|
MIN | 57.6% | 34 | 167 | 341 | 49.0% |
| 14 |
|
IND | 57.6% | 34 | 119 | 230 | 51.7% |
| 15 |
|
LAS | 57.5% | 32 | 207 | 406 | 51.0% |
| 16 |
|
CON | 57.3% | 34 | 104 | 255 | 40.8% |
| 17 |
|
CHI | 56.8% | 21 | 58 | 118 | 49.2% |
| 18 |
|
LVA | 56.6% | 34 | 152 | 358 | 42.5% |
| 19 |
|
WAS | 56.5% | 34 | 76 | 176 | 43.2% |
| 20 |
|
IND | 56.2% | 30 | 99 | 203 | 48.8% |
| 21 |
|
NYL | 56.0% | 24 | 81 | 173 | 46.8% |
| 22 |
|
CON | 56.0% | 34 | 173 | 386 | 44.8% |
| 23 |
|
LVA | 55.8% | 34 | 141 | 289 | 48.8% |
| 24 |
|
LVA | 55.8% | 32 | 196 | 389 | 50.4% |
| 25 |
|
NYL | 55.4% | 34 | 142 | 361 | 39.3% |
| 26 |
|
MIN | 55.4% | 33 | 84 | 209 | 40.2% |
| 27 |
|
CHI | 55.2% | 33 | 135 | 299 | 45.2% |
| 28 |
|
WAS | 55.0% | 34 | 87 | 172 | 50.6% |
| 29 |
|
MIN | 55.0% | 26 | 89 | 206 | 43.2% |
| 30 |
|
LVA | 54.7% | 26 | 158 | 330 | 47.9% |
| 31 |
|
CHI | 54.4% | 34 | 107 | 233 | 45.9% |
| 32 |
|
SEA | 54.4% | 34 | 106 | 205 | 51.7% |
| 33 |
|
NYL | 54.1% | 18 | 71 | 152 | 46.7% |
| 34 |
|
LAS | 54.1% | 32 | 125 | 253 | 49.4% |
| 35 |
|
LAS | 54.0% | 28 | 54 | 113 | 47.8% |
| 36 |
|
IND | 54.0% | 34 | 127 | 297 | 42.8% |
| 37 |
|
LAS | 53.8% | 23 | 93 | 242 | 38.4% |
| 38 |
|
WAS | 53.2% | 33 | 123 | 296 | 41.6% |
| 39 |
|
NYL | 52.8% | 24 | 65 | 156 | 41.7% |
| 40 |
|
CHI | 52.7% | 23 | 103 | 210 | 49.1% |
| 41 |
|
SEA | 52.3% | 34 | 227 | 517 | 43.9% |
| 42 |
|
SEA | 52.2% | 33 | 82 | 223 | 36.8% |
| 43 |
|
ATL | 52.1% | 32 | 107 | 235 | 45.5% |
| 44 |
|
LAS | 52.1% | 32 | 55 | 143 | 38.5% |
| 45 |
|
ATL | 52.0% | 34 | 107 | 289 | 37.0% |
| 46 |
|
PHO | 52.0% | 32 | 71 | 182 | 39.0% |
| 47 |
|
LAS | 51.4% | 22 | 89 | 211 | 42.2% |
| 48 |
|
MIN | 51.3% | 33 | 57 | 154 | 37.0% |
| 49 |
|
CON | 51.3% | 34 | 168 | 333 | 50.5% |
| 50 |
|
NYL | 51.2% | 31 | 54 | 130 | 41.5% |
1–50 of 95Next →