2016 WNBA True Shooting Percentage Leaders
Shooting efficiency including free throws
Nneka Ogwumike led the WNBA in true shooting percentage in 2016 with 73.7%, 4.2 percentage points ahead of Erlana Larkins (69.5%). It is the best single-season true shooting percentage mark in WNBA history.
Showing players who met the games-played minimum for the season. Show all players
Led the WNBA in 2016
Nneka Ogwumike
LAS
73.7%
True Shooting Percentage
4.2% clear of Erlana Larkins
Showing True Shooting Percentage and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | TS% | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LAS | 73.7% | 33 | 244 | 367 | 66.5% |
| 2 |
|
IND | 69.5% | 33 | 106 | 166 | 63.9% |
| 3 |
|
SEA | 66.7% | 33 | 126 | 200 | 63.0% |
| 4 |
|
NYL | 65.4% | 27 | 75 | 117 | 64.1% |
| 5 |
|
PHO | 64.5% | 25 | 102 | 209 | 48.8% |
| 6 |
|
MIN | 63.4% | 34 | 182 | 306 | 59.5% |
| 7 |
|
CON | 63.0% | 33 | 158 | 269 | 58.7% |
| 8 |
|
PHO | 62.1% | 34 | 178 | 325 | 54.8% |
| 9 |
|
CON | 60.9% | 34 | 85 | 160 | 53.1% |
| 10 |
|
SEA | 60.9% | 33 | 105 | 217 | 48.4% |
| 11 |
|
MIN | 60.5% | 34 | 93 | 162 | 57.4% |
| 12 |
|
WAS | 60.0% | 34 | 210 | 394 | 53.3% |
| 13 |
|
CHI | 59.8% | 28 | 214 | 441 | 48.5% |
| 14 |
|
SAN | 59.6% | 25 | 77 | 141 | 54.6% |
| 15 |
|
DAL | 59.5% | 32 | 49 | 112 | 43.8% |
| 16 |
|
NYL | 59.3% | 34 | 76 | 133 | 57.1% |
| 17 |
|
LAS | 59.3% | 33 | 142 | 333 | 42.6% |
| 18 |
|
IND | 58.5% | 33 | 139 | 250 | 55.6% |
| 19 | Imani McGee-Stafford | CHI | 57.8% | 31 | 87 | 157 | 55.4% |
| 20 |
|
MIN | 57.8% | 32 | 123 | 240 | 51.3% |
| 21 |
|
PHO | 57.7% | 32 | 152 | 281 | 54.1% |
| 22 |
|
SEA | 57.6% | 34 | 208 | 455 | 45.7% |
| 23 |
|
MIN | 57.4% | 34 | 223 | 498 | 44.8% |
| 24 |
|
SEA | 57.3% | 34 | 160 | 356 | 44.9% |
| 25 |
|
ATL | 57.1% | 33 | 153 | 347 | 44.1% |
| 26 |
|
PHO | 56.3% | 33 | 180 | 455 | 39.6% |
| 27 |
|
PHO | 56.3% | 34 | 154 | 363 | 42.4% |
| 28 |
|
NYL | 56.0% | 33 | 156 | 385 | 40.5% |
| 29 |
|
ATL | 55.9% | 34 | 124 | 266 | 46.6% |
| 30 |
|
WAS | 55.9% | 34 | 119 | 247 | 48.2% |
| 31 |
|
IND | 55.7% | 30 | 73 | 133 | 54.9% |
| 32 |
|
DAL | 55.5% | 34 | 119 | 217 | 54.8% |
| 33 |
|
CHI | 55.4% | 34 | 129 | 274 | 47.1% |
| 34 | Sonja Petrovic | PHO | 55.4% | 31 | 51 | 122 | 41.8% |
| 35 |
|
IND | 55.4% | 34 | 146 | 337 | 43.3% |
| 36 |
|
LAS | 55.2% | 34 | 150 | 279 | 53.8% |
| 37 |
|
LAS | 54.9% | 34 | 102 | 227 | 44.9% |
| 38 |
|
CHI | 54.9% | 31 | 77 | 149 | 51.7% |
| 39 |
|
IND | 54.8% | 29 | 87 | 217 | 40.1% |
| 40 |
|
SEA | 54.6% | 31 | 60 | 127 | 47.2% |
| 41 |
|
MIN | 54.5% | 33 | 92 | 193 | 47.7% |
| 42 |
|
LAS | 54.5% | 33 | 71 | 157 | 45.2% |
| 43 |
|
CHI | 54.4% | 30 | 96 | 229 | 41.9% |
| 44 |
|
SEA | 54.3% | 34 | 195 | 452 | 43.1% |
| 45 |
|
DAL | 54.2% | 32 | 100 | 254 | 39.4% |
| 46 |
|
DAL | 54.1% | 34 | 128 | 320 | 40.0% |
| 47 |
|
NYL | 53.6% | 33 | 57 | 127 | 44.9% |
| 48 | Shenise Johnson | IND | 53.2% | 29 | 98 | 239 | 41.0% |
| 49 |
|
CHI | 53.1% | 34 | 87 | 176 | 49.4% |
| 50 |
|
LAS | 53.0% | 34 | 190 | 430 | 44.2% |
1–50 of 98Next →