2016 WNBA Free Throws Attempted Leaders
Free throws attempted
Angel McCoughtry led the WNBA in free throws attempted with 217 in 2016, 23 ahead of Tiffany Hayes (194). It stands 40th among all single seasons in WNBA history.
Led the WNBA in 2016
Angel McCoughtry
ATL
217
Free Throws Attempted
23 clear of Tiffany Hayes
Showing Free Throws Attempted and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | FTA | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
ATL | 217 | 33 | 223 | 514 | 43.4% |
| 2 |
|
ATL | 194 | 33 | 153 | 347 | 44.1% |
| 3 |
|
SEA | 192 | 34 | 208 | 455 | 45.7% |
| 4 | Tayler Hill | WAS | 187 | 32 | 139 | 399 | 34.8% |
| 5 |
|
PHO | 168 | 34 | 154 | 363 | 42.4% |
| 6 |
|
LAS | 168 | 33 | 244 | 367 | 66.5% |
| 7 |
|
MIN | 167 | 34 | 223 | 498 | 44.8% |
| 8 |
|
PHO | 166 | 34 | 178 | 325 | 54.8% |
| 9 |
|
DAL | 162 | 34 | 128 | 320 | 40.0% |
| 10 |
|
PHO | 154 | 33 | 180 | 455 | 39.6% |
| 11 |
|
NYL | 154 | 32 | 273 | 622 | 43.9% |
| 12 |
|
MIN | 152 | 34 | 182 | 306 | 59.5% |
| 13 |
|
SEA | 147 | 34 | 195 | 452 | 43.1% |
| 14 |
|
DAL | 145 | 34 | 153 | 433 | 35.3% |
| 15 |
|
LAS | 140 | 34 | 190 | 430 | 44.2% |
| 16 |
|
CON | 139 | 33 | 158 | 269 | 58.7% |
| 17 |
|
CHI | 139 | 28 | 214 | 441 | 48.5% |
| 18 |
|
ATL | 133 | 34 | 157 | 355 | 44.2% |
| 19 |
|
DAL | 132 | 27 | 113 | 290 | 39.0% |
| 20 |
|
CON | 131 | 31 | 130 | 267 | 48.7% |
| 21 |
|
IND | 123 | 34 | 146 | 337 | 43.3% |
| 22 |
|
NYL | 121 | 33 | 91 | 226 | 40.3% |
| 23 |
|
DAL | 121 | 32 | 100 | 254 | 39.4% |
| 24 |
|
ATL | 115 | 34 | 124 | 266 | 46.6% |
| 25 |
|
IND | 101 | 34 | 87 | 241 | 36.1% |
| 26 |
|
SAN | 98 | 34 | 125 | 324 | 38.6% |
| 27 |
|
NYL | 95 | 33 | 156 | 385 | 40.5% |
| 28 |
|
WAS | 95 | 32 | 73 | 198 | 36.9% |
| 29 |
|
CHI | 93 | 33 | 163 | 380 | 42.9% |
| 30 |
|
SAN | 89 | 34 | 185 | 434 | 42.6% |
| 31 |
|
IND | 88 | 29 | 87 | 217 | 40.1% |
| 32 |
|
WAS | 85 | 34 | 210 | 394 | 53.3% |
| 33 |
|
IND | 85 | 32 | 85 | 246 | 34.6% |
| 34 |
|
WAS | 83 | 34 | 119 | 247 | 48.2% |
| 35 |
|
SAN | 83 | 25 | 81 | 192 | 42.2% |
| 36 |
|
NYL | 81 | 33 | 75 | 208 | 36.1% |
| 37 |
|
LAS | 81 | 33 | 142 | 333 | 42.6% |
| 38 |
|
CON | 79 | 34 | 150 | 368 | 40.8% |
| 39 |
|
SEA | 79 | 33 | 126 | 200 | 63.0% |
| 40 |
|
PHO | 75 | 25 | 102 | 209 | 48.8% |
| 41 |
|
MIN | 74 | 32 | 123 | 240 | 51.3% |
| 42 |
|
CHI | 73 | 30 | 96 | 229 | 41.9% |
| 43 |
|
DAL | 73 | 18 | 72 | 163 | 44.2% |
| 44 |
|
PHO | 72 | 32 | 152 | 281 | 54.1% |
| 45 |
|
MIN | 70 | 33 | 92 | 193 | 47.7% |
| 46 |
|
DAL | 70 | 27 | 116 | 300 | 38.7% |
| 47 |
|
CON | 69 | 34 | 85 | 160 | 53.1% |
| 48 |
|
IND | 69 | 33 | 106 | 166 | 63.9% |
| 49 |
|
SAN | 68 | 17 | 102 | 278 | 36.7% |
| 50 |
|
CON | 65 | 34 | 169 | 439 | 38.5% |
1–50 of 157Next →