2016 WNBA Three-Pointers Attempted Leaders
Three-pointers attempted
Diana Taurasi led the WNBA in three-pointers attempted with 254 in 2016, 46 ahead of Sugar Rodgers (208). It stands 33rd among all single seasons in WNBA history.
Led the WNBA in 2016
Diana Taurasi
PHO
254
Three-Pointers Attempted
46 clear of Sugar Rodgers
Showing Three-Pointers Attempted and the stats that give it context
Full stat line
| # | Player | Team | 3PA | GP | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
PHO | 254 | 33 | 180 | 455 | 39.6% |
| 2 |
|
NYL | 208 | 33 | 156 | 385 | 40.5% |
| 3 |
|
LAS | 191 | 33 | 142 | 333 | 42.6% |
| 4 | Tayler Hill | WAS | 171 | 32 | 139 | 399 | 34.8% |
| 5 |
|
CON | 168 | 34 | 169 | 439 | 38.5% |
| 6 |
|
SEA | 162 | 34 | 160 | 356 | 44.9% |
| 7 |
|
MIN | 161 | 34 | 223 | 498 | 44.8% |
| 8 |
|
PHO | 152 | 34 | 154 | 363 | 42.4% |
| 9 |
|
DAL | 150 | 34 | 153 | 433 | 35.3% |
| 10 |
|
SEA | 133 | 34 | 208 | 455 | 45.7% |
| 11 |
|
SEA | 132 | 34 | 195 | 452 | 43.1% |
| 12 |
|
IND | 123 | 32 | 85 | 246 | 34.6% |
| 13 |
|
DAL | 120 | 34 | 128 | 320 | 40.0% |
| 14 |
|
ATL | 117 | 33 | 153 | 347 | 44.1% |
| 15 |
|
LAS | 110 | 34 | 190 | 430 | 44.2% |
| 16 |
|
WAS | 105 | 22 | 55 | 166 | 33.1% |
| 17 |
|
CON | 101 | 34 | 150 | 368 | 40.8% |
| 18 |
|
CHI | 101 | 28 | 214 | 441 | 48.5% |
| 19 |
|
PHO | 101 | 25 | 102 | 209 | 48.8% |
| 20 |
|
IND | 100 | 34 | 146 | 337 | 43.3% |
| 21 |
|
SEA | 99 | 32 | 59 | 151 | 39.1% |
| 22 |
|
SAN | 95 | 17 | 102 | 278 | 36.7% |
| 23 |
|
SEA | 93 | 33 | 105 | 217 | 48.4% |
| 24 |
|
CON | 90 | 33 | 96 | 250 | 38.4% |
| 25 |
|
DAL | 89 | 27 | 116 | 300 | 38.7% |
| 26 |
|
SAN | 88 | 34 | 185 | 434 | 42.6% |
| 27 |
|
DAL | 87 | 32 | 100 | 254 | 39.4% |
| 28 |
|
ATL | 86 | 33 | 223 | 514 | 43.4% |
| 29 |
|
IND | 85 | 34 | 87 | 241 | 36.1% |
| 30 |
|
MIN | 84 | 34 | 87 | 219 | 39.7% |
| 31 |
|
CHI | 82 | 34 | 129 | 274 | 47.1% |
| 32 |
|
DAL | 82 | 32 | 42 | 112 | 37.5% |
| 33 |
|
SAN | 78 | 34 | 125 | 324 | 38.6% |
| 34 | Shenise Johnson | IND | 78 | 29 | 98 | 239 | 41.0% |
| 35 |
|
CON | 77 | 28 | 38 | 104 | 36.5% |
| 36 |
|
DAL | 77 | 27 | 113 | 290 | 39.0% |
| 37 |
|
CHI | 74 | 30 | 96 | 229 | 41.9% |
| 38 |
|
IND | 74 | 29 | 87 | 217 | 40.1% |
| 39 |
|
SAN | 72 | 34 | 75 | 215 | 34.9% |
| 40 |
|
WAS | 68 | 31 | 56 | 161 | 34.8% |
| 41 |
|
WAS | 67 | 34 | 210 | 394 | 53.3% |
| 42 |
|
CHI | 66 | 34 | 102 | 240 | 42.5% |
| 43 |
|
LAS | 64 | 34 | 102 | 227 | 44.9% |
| 44 | Bria Holmes | ATL | 62 | 33 | 91 | 209 | 43.5% |
| 45 |
|
SAN | 61 | 30 | 65 | 164 | 39.6% |
| 46 |
|
DAL | 60 | 32 | 49 | 112 | 43.8% |
| 47 |
|
WAS | 58 | 24 | 50 | 133 | 37.6% |
| 48 |
|
MIN | 57 | 34 | 83 | 227 | 36.6% |
| 49 |
|
IND | 57 | 34 | 114 | 273 | 41.8% |
| 50 |
|
CON | 56 | 26 | 67 | 162 | 41.4% |
1–50 of 157Next →